Nordic health economics methodology for women's health
A Nordic Women's Health Burden Report harmonising register-based components and McKinsey directional modelling.
Health budgets are national and regional, but shared methodology enables cross-country comparison. Three components — burden report, cost-effectiveness framework, and annual State of Nordic Women's Health — produce the credible economic data that parliamentary briefings and EU advocacy require.
Transformation
From
Two Nordic register-based components (IHE Report 2024:9, IZA Discussion Paper 17793) and the McKinsey directional total together underpin a USD 30–50bn Nordic women's health opportunity, but no Nordic body has consolidated them under one methodology; the policy conversation stays anchored in consultancy aggregate rather than Nordic-specific numbers
To
A Nordic Women's Health Burden Report harmonising the register-based components and McKinsey directional reference, using Australia's National Women's Health Strategy monitoring framework (Sep 2025) as governance template — establishing the baseline against which the trajectory toward 2040 can be measured
Description
A coordinated pan-Nordic methodology would value the women’s health gap in Nordicspecific terms, by harmonising the McKinsey-derived directional modelling and the Nordic register-based components into one framework feeding annual State of Nordic Women’s Health reporting. The two Nordic register-based components are the IHE Report 2024:9, published in October 2024 with Astellas funding, and IZA Discussion Paper 17793, published in March 2025. Together with the directional total, they underpin the USD 30 to 50 billion Nordic women’s health opportunity. No Nordic body has yet consolidated them under one methodology, which leaves the policy conversation anchored in consultancy aggregate rather than Nordic-specific numbers.
A Nordic Women’s Health Burden Report, with the register-based components as anchor, McKinsey global modelling as directional reference, and Australia’s National Women’s Health Strategy monitoring framework of September 2025 as governance template, would let the Nordic case for women’s health investment carry Nordic-specific weight in front of the NMC, the European Commission, and the European Investment Bank. The Report would also establish the baseline against which the trajectory toward 2040 can be measured. NordForsk, the NMC, the five national HTA bodies, IHE, and the University of Bergen are positioned to coordinate it.
Evidence anchors
At a glance
- Natural lead
- NordForsk, the NMC, five national HTA bodies, IHE, and University of Bergen
- Indicative investment
- €1–2M (methodology development)
Entry points
- NordicNordForsk commissions methodology development
- NationalHTA bodies adopt shared framework
- RegionalRegional authorities use burden data for budget allocation
Indicators
Output
- Methodology framework published
- All 5 countries produce comparable burden reports
- Annual State of Nordic Women's Health established
Handoff
- First burden estimates available for parliamentary briefings
- Economic data supports Care investment cases (C-M-1)
- EU advocacy uses Nordic aggregate data (R-M-3)
Outcome
- Women's health burden quantified comparably
- Parliamentary briefings reference economic data
Building on
Nordic foundations
European frameworks
International inspirations
Connected needs
Cite this need
Cite this need
Persson, J. (2026). C-M-2 Nordic health economics methodology for women's health. In The Nordic Implementation Playbook for Women's Health 2040. CIFS. https://womenshealth2040.org/playbook#c-m-2